ESOTERIC CHRISTIANITY/PART 11
Chapter
XI.
THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS.
"I believe in ... the forgiveness
of sins." "I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins."
The words fall facilely from the lips of worshippers in every Christian church
throughout the world, as they repeat the familiar creeds called those of the
Apostles and the Nicene. Among the sayings of Jesus the words frequently recur:
"Thy sins are forgiven thee," and it is noteworthy that this phrase
constantly accompanies the exercise of His healing powers, the release from
physical and moral disease being thus marked as simultaneous. In fact, on one
occasion He pointed to the healing of a palsy-stricken man as a sign that he
had a right to declare to a man that his sins were forgiven. So also of one woman it was said: "Her
sins, which are many, are forgiven, for she loved much." In the famous Gnostic treatise, the Pistis
Sophia, the very purpose of the Mysteries is said to be the remission of
sins. "Should they have been sinners, should they have been in all the
sins and all the iniquities of the world, of which I have spoken unto you,
nevertheless if they turn themselves and repent, and have made the renunciation
which I have just described unto you, give ye unto them the mysteries of the
kingdom of light; hide them not from them at all. It is because of sin that I
have brought these mysteries into the world, for the remission of all the sins
which they have committed from the beginning. Wherefore have I said unto you
aforetime, 'I came not to call the righteous.' Now, therefore, I have brought
the mysteries, that the sins of all men may be remitted, and they be brought
into the kingdom of light. For these mysteries are the boon of the first
mystery of the destruction of the sins and iniquities of all
sinners."
In these Mysteries, the remission
of sin is by baptism, as in the acknowledgment in the Nicene Creed. Jesus says:
"Hearken, again, that I may tell you the word in truth, of what type is
the mystery of baptism which remitteth sins.... When a man receiveth the
mysteries of the baptisms, those mysteries become a mighty fire, exceedingly
fierce, wise, which burneth up all sins; they enter into the soul occultly, and
devour all the sins which the spiritual counterfeit hath implanted in it."
And after describing further the process of purification, Jesus adds:
"This is the way in which the mysteries of the baptisms remit sins and
every iniquity."
In one form or another the
"forgiveness of sins" appears in most, if not in all, religions; and
wherever this consensus of opinion is found, we may safely conclude, according
to the principle already laid down, that some fact in nature underlies
it. Moreover, there is a response in human nature to this idea that sins
are forgiven; we notice that people suffer under a consciousness of
wrong-doing, and that when they shake themselves clear of their past, and free
themselves from the shackling fetters of remorse, they go forward with glad
heart and sunlit eyes, though erstwhile enclouded by darkness. They feel as
though a burden were lifted off them, a clog removed. The "sense of
sin" has disappeared, and with it the gnawing pain. They know the springtime
of the soul, the word of power which makes all things new. A song of gratitude
wells up as the natural outburst of the heart, the time for the singing of
birds is come, there is "joy among the Angels." This not uncommon
experience is one that becomes puzzling, when the person experiencing it, or
seeing it in another, begins to ask himself what has really taken place, what
has brought about the change in consciousness, the effects of which are so
manifest.
Modern thinkers, who have
thoroughly assimilated the idea of changeless laws underlying all
phenomena, and who have studied the workings of these laws, are at first apt to
reject any and every theory of the forgiveness of sins as being inconsistent
with that fundamental truth, just as the scientist, penetrated with the idea of
the inviolability of law, repels all thought which is inconsistent with it. And
both are right in founding themselves on the unfaltering working of law, for
law is but the expression of the divine Nature, in which there is no
variableness, neither shadow of turning. Any view of the forgiveness of sins
that we may adopt must not clash with this fundamental idea, as necessary to
ethical as to physical science. "The bottom would fall out of
everything" if we could not rest securely in the everlasting arms of the
Good Law.
But in pursuing our
investigations, we are struck with the fact that the very Teachers who are most
insistent on the changeless working of law are also those who emphatically
proclaim the forgiveness of sins. At one time Jesus is saying: "That every
idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day
of judgment," and at another:
"Son, be of good cheer, thy sins be forgiven thee." So in the Bhagavad Gîtâ we
read constantly of the bonds of action, that "the world is bound by
action," and that a man
"recovereth the characteristics of his former body;" and yet it is said that "even if the
most sinful worship me, with undivided heart, he, too, must be accounted
righteous." It would seem, then, that
whatever may have been intended in the world's Scriptures by the phrase,
"the forgiveness of sins," it was not thought, by Those who best know
the law, to clash with the inviolable sequence of cause and effect.
If we examine even the crudest
idea of the forgiveness of sins prevalent in our own day, we find that the
believer in it does not mean that the forgiven sinner is to escape from the
consequences of his sin in this world; the drunkard, whose sins are forgiven on
his repentance, is still seen to suffer from shaken nerves,
impaired digestion, and the lack of confidence shown towards him by his
fellow-men. The statements made as to forgiveness, when they are examined, are
ultimately found to refer to the relations between the repentant sinner and
God, and to the post-mortem penalties attached to unforgiven
sin in the creed of the speaker, and not to any escape from the mundane
consequences of sin. The loss of belief in reincarnation, and of a sane view as
to the continuity of life, whether it were spent in this or in the next two
worlds, brought with it various
incongruities and indefensible assertions, among them the blasphemous and
terrible idea of the eternal torture of the human soul for sins committed
during the brief span of one life spent on earth. In order to escape from this
nightmare, theologians posited a forgiveness which should release the sinner
from this dread imprisonment in an eternal hell. It did not, and was never
supposed to, set him free in this world from the natural consequences of his
ill-doings, nor—except in modern Protestant communities—was it held to
deliver him from prolonged purgatorial sufferings, the direct results of sin,
after the death of the physical body. The law had its course, both in this
world and in purgatory, and in each world sorrow followed on the heels of sin,
even as the wheels follow the ox. It was but eternal torture—which existed only
in the clouded imagination of the believer—that was escaped by the forgiveness
of sins; and we may perhaps go so far as to suggest that the dogmatist, having
postulated an eternal hell as the monstrous result of transient errors, felt
compelled to provide a way of escape from an incredible and unjust fate, and
therefore further postulated an incredible and unjust forgiveness. Schemes that
are elaborated by human speculation, without regard to the facts of life, are
apt to land the speculator in thought-morasses, whence he can only extricate
himself by blundering through the mire in an opposite direction. A superfluous
eternal hell was balanced by a superfluous forgiveness, and thus the uneven
scales of justice were again rendered level. Leaving these aberrations
of the unenlightened, let us return into the realm of fact and right
reason.
When a man has committed an evil
action he has attached himself to a sorrow, for sorrow is ever the plant that
springs from the seed of sin. It may be said, even more accurately, that sin
and sorrow are but the two sides of one act, not two separate events. As every
object has two sides, one of which is behind, out of sight, when the other is
in front, in sight, so every act has two sides, which cannot both be seen at
once in the physical world. In other worlds, good and happiness, evil and
sorrow, are seen as the two sides of the same thing. This is what is called
karma—a convenient and now widely-used term, originally Samskrit, expressing
this connection or identity, literally meaning "action"—and the
suffering is therefore called the karmic result of the wrong. The result, the
"other side," may not follow immediately, may not even accrue during
the present incarnation, but sooner or later it will appear and clasp the
sinner with its arms of pain. Now a result in the physical world, an effect
experienced through our physical consciousness, is the final outcome of a
cause set going in the past; it is the ripened fruit; in it a particular force
becomes manifest and exhausts itself. That force has been working outwards, and
its effects are already over in the mind ere it appears in the body. Its bodily
manifestation, its appearance, in the physical world, is the sign of the
completion of its course. If at such a
moment the sinner, having exhausted the karma of his sin, comes into contact
with a Sage who can see the past and the present, the invisible and the
visible, such a Sage may discern the ending of the particular karma, and, the
sentence being completed, may declare the captive free. Such an instance seems
to be given in the story of the man sick of the palsy, already alluded to, a
case typical of many. A physical ailment is the last expression of a past
ill-doing; the mental and moral outworking is completed, and the sufferer
is brought—by the agency of some Angel, as an administrator of the law—into the
presence of One able to relieve physical disease by the exertion of a higher
energy. First, the Initiate declares that the man's sins are forgiven, and then
justifies his insight by the authoritative word, "Arise, take up thy bed,
and go unto thine house." Had no such enlightened One been there, the disease
would have passed away under the restoring touch of nature, under a force
applied by the invisible angelic Intelligences, who carry out in this world the
workings of karmic law; when a greater One is acting, this force is of more
swiftly compelling power, and the physical vibrations are at once attuned to
the harmony that is health. All such forgiveness of sins may be termed
declaratory; the karma is exhausted, and a "knower of karma" declares
the fact. The assurance brings a relief to the mind that is akin to the relief
experienced by a prisoner when the order for his release is given, that order
being as much a part of the law as the original sentence; but the relief
of the man who thus learns of the exhaustion of an evil karma is keener,
because he cannot himself tell the term of its action.
It is noticeable that these
declarations of forgiveness are constantly coupled with the statement that the
sufferer showed "faith," and that without this nothing could be
done; i.e., the real agent in the ending of this karma is the
sinner himself. In the case of the "woman that was a sinner," the two
declarations are coupled: "Thy sins are forgiven.... Thy faith hath saved
thee; go in peace." This
"faith" is the up-welling in man of his own divine essence, seeking
the divine ocean of like essence, and when this breaks through the lower nature
that holds it in—as the water-spring breaks through the encumbering
earth-clods—the power thus liberated works on the whole nature, bringing it
into harmony with itself. The man only becomes conscious of this as the karmic
crust of evil is broken up by its force, and that glad consciousness of a power
within himself hitherto unknown, asserting itself as soon as the evil
karma is exhausted, is a large factor in the joy, relief, and new strength that
follow on the feeling that sin is "forgiven," that its results are
past.
And this brings us to the heart
of the subject—the changes that go on in a man's inner nature, unrecognised by
that part of his consciousness which works within the limits of his brain,
until they suddenly assert themselves within those limits, coming apparently
from nowhere, bursting forth "from the blue," pouring from an unknown
source. What wonder that a man, bewildered by their downrush—knowing nothing of
the mysteries of his own nature, nothing of "the inner God" that is
verily himself—imagines that to be from without which is really from within,
and, unconscious of his own Divinity, thinks only of Divinities in the world
external to himself. And this misconception is the more easy, because the final
touch, the vibration that breaks the imprisoning shell, is often the answer
from the Divinity within another man, or within some superhuman being,
responding to the insistent cry from the imprisoned Divinity within himself;
he oft-times recognises the brotherly aid, while not recognising that he
himself, the cry from his inner nature, called it forth. As an explanation from
a wiser than ourselves may make an intellectual difficulty clear to our mind,
though it is our own mind that, thus aided, grasps the solution; as an
encouraging word from one purer than ourselves may nerve us to a moral effort
that we should have thought beyond our power, though it is our own strength
that makes it; so may a loftier Spirit than our own, one more conscious of its
Divinity, aid us to put forth our own divine energy, though it is that very
putting forth that lifts us to a higher plane. We are all bound by ties of
brotherly help to those above us as to those below us, and why should we, who
so constantly find ourselves able to help in their development souls less
advanced than ourselves, hesitate to admit that we can receive similar help
from Those far above us, and that our progress may be rendered much swifter by
Their aid?
Now among the changes that go on
in a man's inner nature, unknown to his lower consciousness, are those that
have to do with the putting forth of his will. The Ego, glancing backward over
his past, balancing up its results, suffering under its mistakes, determines on
a change of attitude, on a change of activity. While his lower vehicle is
still, under his former impulses, plunging along lines of action that bring it
into sharp collisions with the law, the Ego determines on an opposite course of
conduct. Hitherto he has turned his face longingly to the animal, the pleasures
of the lower world have held him fast enchained. Now he turns his face to the
true goal of evolution, and determines to work for loftier joys. He sees that
the whole world is evolving, and that if he sets himself against that mighty
current it clashes him aside, bruising him sorely in the process; he sees that
if he sets himself with it, it will bear him onwards on its bosom and land him
in the desired haven.
He then resolves to change his
life, he turns determinedly on his steps, he faces the other way. The
first result of the effort to turn his lower nature into the changed course, is
much distress and disturbance. The habits formed under the impacts of the old
views resist stubbornly the impulses flowing from the new, and a bitter
conflict arises. Gradually the consciousness working in the brain accepts the
decision made on higher planes, and then "becomes conscious of sin"
by this very recognition of the law. The sense of error deepens, remorse preys
on the mind; spasmodic efforts are made towards improvement, and, frustrated by
old habits, repeatedly fail, till the man, overwhelmed by grief for the past,
despair of the present, is plunged into hopeless gloom. At last, the
ever-increasing suffering wrings from the Ego a cry for help, answered from the
inner depths of his own nature, from the God within as well as around him, the
Life of his life. He turns from the lower nature that is thwarting him to the
higher which is his innermost being, from the separated self that tortures him
to the One Self that is the Heart of all.
But this change of front means
that he turns his face from the darkness, that he turns his face to the
light. The light was always there, but his back was towards it; now he sees the
sun, and its radiance cheers his eyes, and overfloods his being with delight.
His heart was closed; it is now flung open, and the ocean of life flows in, in
full tide, suffusing him with joy. Wave after wave of new life uplifts him, and
the gladness of the dawn surrounds him. He sees his past as past, because his
will is set to follow a higher path, and he recks little of the suffering that
the past may bequeath to him, since he knows he will not hand on such bitter
legacy from his present. This sense of peace, of joy, of freedom, is the
feeling spoken of as the result of the forgiveness of sins. The obstacles set
up by the lower nature between the God within and the God without are swept
away, and that nature scarce recognises that the change is in itself and not in
the Oversoul. As a child, having thrust away the mother's guiding hand and
hidden its face against the wall, may fancy itself alone and forgotten, until,
turning with a cry, it finds around it the protecting mother-arms that
were never but a handsbreadth away; so does man in his wilfulness push away the
shielding arms of the divine Mother of the worlds, only to find, when he turns
back his face, that he has never been outside their protecting shelter, and
that wherever he may wander that guarding love is round him still.
The key to this change in the
man, that brings about "forgiveness," is given in the verse of
the Bhagavad-Gîtâ already partly quoted: "Even if the
most sinful worship me, with undivided heart, he too must be accounted
righteous, for he hath rightly resolved." On that right
resolution follows the inevitable result: "Speedily he becometh dutiful
and goeth to peace." The essence of
sin lies in setting the will of the part against the will of the whole, the
human against the Divine. When this is changed, when the Ego puts his separate
will into union with the will that works for evolution, then, in the world
where to will is to do, in the world where effects are seen as present in
causes, the man is "accounted righteous;" the effects on the
lower planes must inevitably follow; "speedily he becometh dutiful"
in action, having already become dutiful in will. Here we judge by actions, the
dead leaves of the past; there they judge by wills, the germinating seeds of
the future. Hence the Christ ever says to men in the lower world: "Judge
not."
Even after the new direction has
been definitely followed, and has become the normal habit of the life, there
come times of failure, alluded to in the Pistis Sophia, when Jesus
is asked whether a man may be again admitted to the Mysteries, after he has
fallen away, if he again repents. The answer of Jesus is in the affirmative,
but he states that a time comes when re-admission is beyond the power of any
save of the highest Mystery, who pardons ever. "Amen, amen, I say unto
you, whosoever shall receive the mysteries of the first mystery, and then shall
turn back and transgress twelve times [even], and then should again repent
twelve times, offering prayer in the mystery of the first mystery, he
shall be forgiven. But if he should transgress after twelve times, should he
turn back and transgress, it shall not be remitted unto him for ever, so that
he may turn again unto his mystery, whatever it be. For him there is no means
of repentance unless he have received the mysteries of that ineffable, which
hath compassion at all times and remitteth sins for ever and ever." These restorations after failure, in which
"sin is remitted," meet us in human life, especially in the higher
phases of evolution. A man is offered an opportunity, which, taken, would open
up to him new possibilities of growth. He fails to grasp it, and falls away
from the position he had gained that made the further opportunity possible. For
him, for the time, further progress is blocked; he must turn all his efforts
wearily to retread the ground he had already trodden, and to regain and make
sure his footing on the place from which he had slipped. Only when this is
accomplished will he hear the gentle Voice that tells him that the past is
out-worn, the weakness turned to strength, and that the gateway is again
open for his passage. Here again the "forgiveness" is but the
declaration by a proper authority of the true state of affairs, the opening of
the gate to the competent, its closure to the incompetent. Where there had been
failure, with its accompanying suffering, this declaration would be felt as a
"baptism for the remission of sins," re-admitting the aspirant to a
privilege lost by his own act; this would certainly give rise to feelings of joy
and peace, to a relief from the burden of sorrow, to a feeling that the clog of
the past had at last fallen from the feet.
Remains one truth that should
never be forgotten: that we are living in an ocean of light, of love, of bliss,
that surrounds us at all times, the Life of God. As the sun floods the earth
with his radiance so does that Life enlighten all, only that Sun of the world
never sets to any part of it. We shut this light out of our consciousness by
our selfishness, our heartlessness, our impurity, our intolerance, but it
shines on us ever the same, bathing us on every side, pressing against our
self-built walls with gentle, strong persistence. When the soul throws
down these excluding walls, the light flows in, and the soul finds itself
flooded with sunshine, breathing the blissful air of heaven. "For the Son
of man is in heaven," though he know it not, and its breezes fan his brow
if he bares it to their breaths. God ever respects man's individuality, and
will not enter his consciousness until that consciousness opens to give
welcome; "Behold I stand at the door and knock" is the attitude of every spiritual
Intelligence towards the evolving human soul; not in lack of sympathy is rooted
that waiting for the open door, but in deepest wisdom.
Man is not to be compelled; he is
to be free. He is not a slave, but a God in the making, and the growth cannot
be forced, but must be willed from within. Only when the will consents, as
Giordano Bruno teaches, will God influence man, though He be "everywhere
present, and ready to come to the aid of whosoever turns to Him through the act
of the intelligence, and who unreservedly presents himself with the
affection of the will." "The
divine potency which is all in all does not proffer or withhold, except through
assimilation or rejection by oneself." "It
is taken in quickly, as the solar light, without hesitation, and makes itself
present to whoever turns himself to it and opens himself to it ... the windows
are opened, but the sun enters in a moment, so does it happen similarly in this
case."a
The sense of
"forgiveness," then, is the feeling which fills the heart with joy
when the will is tuned to harmony with the Divine, when, the soul having opened
its windows, the sunshine of love and light and bliss pours in, when the part
feels its oneness with the whole, and the One Life thrills each vein. This is
the noble truth that gives vitality to even the crudest presentation of the
"forgiveness of sins," and that makes it often, despite its
intellectual incompleteness, an inspirer to pure and spiritual living. And this
is the truth, as seen in the Lesser Mysteries.
Comments
Post a Comment