A STUDY IN KARMA/PART 28
THE OPPOSING SCHOOLS
In
the thought of the outer world, quite apart from the ideas of reincarnation and
karma, there has been much opposing opinion. Robert Owen and his school
regarded man as the creation of circumstances, ignoring heredity, that faint
scientific reflection of karma; they considered that by changing the
environment the man could be changed, most effectively if the child were taken
ere he had formed bad habits; a child taken out of evil surroundings and placed
amid good ones would grow into a good man. The failure of Robert Owen’s social
experiment showed that his theory did not contain all the truth. Others,
realising the force of heredity, almost ignored environment; “Nature,” said
Ludwig Buchner, “is stronger than nurture.” In both these extreme views there
is truth. Inasmuch as the child brings with him the nature built in his past,
but dons the garment of a new mentality and a new emotional nature, in which
his self-created faculties and qualities exist indeed, but as germs, not as
fully developed powers, these germs may be nourished into rapid growth or
atrophied by lack of nourishment, and this is wrought by the influence of the
environment for good or ill. Moreover, the child puts on also the garment of a
new physical body, with its own physical heredity, designed for the expression
of some of the powers he brings with him, and this can be largely affected by
his environment, and developed healthily or unhealthily. These facts were on
the side of Robert Owen’s theory, and they explain the successes gained by such
philanthropic institutions as Dr. Barnardo’s Homes, wherein germs of good are
cultured and germs of evil are starved out. But the congenital criminal, and
beings of that ilk, none may redeem in a single life, and these, of various
grades, are the nonsuccesses of the benevolent rescuer.
Equally
true is it, as the opposite school affirmed, that inborn character is a force
with which every educationalist must reckon; he cannot create faculties which
are not there; he cannot wholly eradicate evil tendencies which, below the surface,
throw out roots, seeking appropriate nourishment; some nourishment reaches
them from the thought-atmosphere around, from the evil
desire-forms which arise from the evil in ) others, forms of thoughts and
desires which float in the air around, and cannot wholly be shut out – save by
occult means, unknown to the ordinary educationalist.
Comments
Post a Comment