A STUDY IN KARMA/PART 36
NATIONAL KARMA
Let
us think on the collective karma of a nation. Face to face with this, the
individual is comparatively helpless, for nothing he can do can free him from
this, and he must trim his sails to it as best he may. Even a Master can but
slightly modify national karma, or change the national atmosphere.
The
rise and fall of nations are brought about by collective karma. Acts of
national righteousness or of national criminality, led up to by noble or base
thinking, largely directed by national ideals, bring about national ascent or
national descent. The actions of the Spanish Inquisition, the driving of the
Jews and of the Moors out of Spain, the atrocious cruelties accompanying the
conquests of Mexico and Peru – all these were national crimes, which dragged
Spain down from its splendid position of power, and reduced it to comparative
powerlessness.
Seismic
changes – earthquakes, volcanoes, floods – or national catastrophes like famine
and plague, all are cases of collective karma, brought about by great streams
of thoughts and actions of a collective rather than an individual character.
As
with a family, so with a nation to a much greater degree, will there be an
atmosphere created by the nation’s past; and national traditions, customs,
viewpoints, will exercise a vast influence on the minds of all who dwell within
the nation. Few individuals can free themselves wholly from these influences,
and consider a question affecting the nation without any bias, or see it from a
standpoint other than that of their own people. Hence largely arise
international quarrels and suspicions, mistaken views, and distorted opinions
of the motives of another nation. Many a war has broken out in consequence of
the differences in the thought-atmospheres surrounding the prospective
combatants, and these difficulties are multiplied when the nations spring from
different racial stocks, as, say, the Italians and the Turks. All the knower of
karma can do, in these cases, is to realise the fact that his opinions and
views are largely the product of the larger individuality of his nation, and to
check this bias as much as he can, giving full weight to the views obtained
from the standpoint of the antagonistic nation.
When
a man finds himself in the grip of a national karma which he cannot
resist – say that he is a member of a conquered nation – he should calmly study
the causes which have led to the national subjugation, and should set to work
to remedy them, endeavouring to influence public opinion along lines which will
eradicate these causes.
Comments
Post a Comment