A STUDY IN KARMA/PART 6
CAUSATION
The
idea of causation has been challenged in modern times, Huxley, for instance,
contending, in the Contemporary Review, that we only knew sequence, not
causation; he said that if a ball moved after it was hit by a bat, you should
not say that the blow of the bat caused the movement, but only that it was
followed by the movement. This extreme scepticism came out strongly in some of
the great men of the nineteenth century, a reaction from the ready credulity
and many unproved assumptions of the Middle Ages. The reaction had its use, but
is now gradually passing away, as extremes ever do.
The
idea of causation arises naturally in the human mind, though unprovable by the
senses; when a phenomenon has been invariably followed by another phenomenon
for long periods of time, the two become linked together in our minds, and when
one appears, the mind, by association of ideas, expects the second; thus the
fact that night has been followed by day from time immemorial gives us a firm
conviction that the sun will rise tomorrow as on countless yesterdays.
Succession alone, however, does not necessarily imply causation; we do not
regard day as the cause of night, nor night as the cause of day, because they
invariably succeed each other. To assert causation, we need more than
invariable succession; we need that the reason shall see that which the senses
are unable to discern – a relation between the two things which brings about
the appearance of the second when the first appears. The succession of day and night
is not caused by either; both are caused by the relation of the earth to the
sun; that relation is a true cause, recognised as such by the reason, and as
long as the relation exists unchanged, day and night will be its effect. In
order to see one thing as the cause of another, the reason must establish a
relation between them which is sufficient for the production of one by the
other; then, and then only, can we rightly assert causation. The links between
phenomena that are never broken, and that are recognised by the reason as an
active relation, bringing into manifestation the second phenomenon whenever the
first is manifested, we call causation. They are the shadows of inter-relations
existing in the Eternal, outside space and time, and they extend over the life
of a universe, wherever the conditions exist for their manifestation. Causation
is an expression of the nature of the LOGOS, an Emanation of the eternal
Reality; wherever there is interrelation in the Eternal which demands
succession for its manifestation in time, there is causation.
Comments
Post a Comment