THE SHINING GATEWAY/PART 4
4.
Actions and motives
Obey
the Right,
And
wrong shall ne’er again assail thy peace,
Nor
error hurt thee more: attune thy heart
To
Purity, and thou shalt reach the
Place
Where sorrow is not, and all evil ends.
It
has been said that " the way to hell is paved with good intentions,"
and one frequently hears sin excused on the ground that it was done with a
"good motive."
There
are actions which are bad-in-themselves, and there are actions which are
good-in-themselves, and good intentions cannot make the former good— selfish
intentions cannot make the latter bad. Foremost among actions which are bad-in-
themselves are those which are classified as "criminal" by all
civilised communities. Thus murder, theft, adultery, libel, etc, are always
bad, and it is not necessary to inquire into the motive which prompts them.
Black and white remain black and white to all eternity, and are not altered by
specious argumentations. A lie is eternally a lie, and no number of good
intentions can turn it into a truth. If a man tell a lie with a good intention,
he has none the less uttered a lie ; if a man speak the truth with a selfish intention,
he has none the less spoken the truth.
Beside
those actions above mentioned, there are others which, while not classified by
the law of the land as criminal, are yet recognised as wrong by nearly all
intelligent people-actions pertaining to social and family life, and to our
everyday relations with our fellowmen. Thus when a child wilfully violates its
duty to its parents, the father does not stop to inquire into the motives of
the child, but metes out the due correction, because the act of disobedience is
wrong-in-itself.
The
reader may here ask, "In being taught, then, to regard the motive, the
condition of heart, as all important, and the act as secondary, have we been
taught wrongly?" No, you have not. The motive is all important, for it
determines the nature of the act, and here we must distinguish between
intentions and motives. When people speak of good and bad motives, they nearly
always mean good or bad intentions— that is, the action is done with a certain
object, good or bad, in view. The motive is the deeply seated cause in the
mind, the habitual condition of heart; the intention is the purpose in view.
Thus an act- may spring from an impure motive, yet be done with the best
intention. It is possible for one to be involved in wrong motives, and yet at
the same time to be so charged with good intentions as to be continually
intruding himself on other people, and interfering in their business and their
lives under the delusion that they "need his help."
Intentions
are more or less superficial, and are largely matters of impulse, while motives
are more deeply seated, and are concerned with a man’s fixed moral condition. A
man may do an action to-day with a good intention, and in a few weeks’ time do
the same action with a bad intention; but in both instances the motive
underlying the action will be the same.
In
reality a wrong act cannot spring from a right motive, although it may be
guided by a good intention. A man who can resort, whether habitually or under
stress of temptation, to murder, theft, lying or other actions known as bad, is
in a dark, confused condition of mind, and is not capable of acting from right
motives. Such acts can only spring from an impure source; and this is why the
Great Teachers rarely refer to motives , but always refer to actions,. In their
precepts they tell us what actions are bad and what are good, without any
reference to motive, for the bad and good acts-in-themselves are the fruits of
bad and good motives. "By their fruits you shall know them."
In
being exhorted to "judge not," we are not taught to persuade
ourselves that grapes are figs and figs grapes, but must employ our judgment in
clearly distinguishing between the two; so in like manner must we distinguish
with unmistakable clearness between bad actions and good actions, so as to
avoid the former and embrace the latter ; for only in this way can one purify
his heart and render himself capable of acting from right motives. A clear
perception of what is bad or good, both in ourselves and others, is not false
judgment, it is wisdom. It is only when one harbours groundless suspicion about
others, and reads into their actions bad and selfish intentions, that he falls
into that judging against which we are warned, and which is so pernicious.
There
is no need to doubt the good intentions of those about us, while, at the same
time, being fully alive to a knowledge of those bad actions which were better
left undone, and those good actions which were better done; taking care not to
do the former, and to do the latter ourselves, thus teaching by our lives
instead of accusing and condemning others. Numberless wrong actions are
committed every day with good intentions ; and this is why so many good
purposes are frustrated and end in disappointment, because the underlying
motive is impure, and the good fruit which is sought does not appear ; the act
is out of harmony with the good intent; the means are not adapted to the end.
Bad actions, bring forth bitter fruit; good actions bring forth sweet fruit.
The
law runs, "Thou shalt not kill; thou shalt not steal; thou shalt not
commit adultery"; not "Thou shalt not kill, steal or commit adultery
with a bad motive.
Wrong
actions are always accompanied with self-delusion, and the chief form which
such self-delusion assumes is that of self-justification. If a man flatter
himself that he can commit a sinful act, and yet be free from sin because he is
prompted by a "pure motive," no limit can be set to the evil which he
may commit.
It
will be found that bad actions, in the majority of instances, arc accompanied
with good intentions. The object of the slanderer generally is to protect his
fellow-men from one another. Troubled with foolish suspicions, or smarting
under the thought of injury, he warns men against each other, speaking only of
their bad qualities, and, in his eagerness, distorting the truth. His intention
is good, namely, to protect his neighbours; but his motive is bad, namely,
hatred of those whom he slanders. Such a man’s good intention is frustrated by
his bad action, and he at last only succeeds in separating himself from all
truth-loving people.
The
sore of a bad action is not cured by plastering it over with good intentions,
nor is the cause of the defilement removed from the heart.
Men
who are involved in bad actions cannot work from pure motives. An issue of foul
water always proceeds from an impure source; and an issue of impure actions
proceeds from a heart that is defiled.
It
greatly simplifies life, and solves all complex problems of conduct, when
certain actions are recognised as eternally bad, and others as eternally good,
and the bad are for ever abandoned, and final refuge is taken in the good.
The
wise and good perform good actions ; and motive, act, and intention being
harmoniously adjusted, their lives are powerful for good, and free from
disappointment, and the good fruit of their efforts appears in due season. They
do not need to defend their actions by subtle and specious arguments, not to
enter into interminable metaphysical speculations concerning motives; but are
content to act and to leave their actions to bear their own fruit.
Let
us not try to persuade ourselves that our good intentions will wipe out the
results of our bad actions; but let us resort to the practice of good actions ;
for only in this way can we acquire goodness; only thus can the life be
established on fixed principles, and the mind be rendered capable of
comprehending, and working from, pure motives.
Comments
Post a Comment