A STUDY IN KARMA /PART 1
A
STUDY IN KARMA
AMONG
the many illuminating gifts to the western world, conveyed to it by the medium
of the Theosophical Society, that of the knowledge of karma comes, perhaps,
next in importance to that of reincarnation. It removes human thought and
desire from the region of arbitrary happenings to the realm of law, and thus
places man’s future under his own control in proportion to the amount of his
knowledge.
The
main conception of karma: “As a man soweth, so shall he also reap,” is easy to grasp.
But the application of this to daily life in detail, the method of its working
and its far-reaching consequences – these are the difficulties which become
more bewildering to the student as his knowledge increases. The principles on
which any natural science is based are, for the most part, readily intelligible
to people of fair intelligence and ordinary education; but as the student
passes from principles to practice, from outline to details, he discovers that
difficulties press upon him, and if he would wholly master his subject he finds
himself compelled to become a specialist, and to devote long periods to the
unraveling of the tangles which confront him. So is it also with this science
of karma; the student cannot remain always in the domain of generalities; he
must study the subdivisions of the primary law, must seek to apply it in all
the circumstances of life, must learn how far it binds and how freedom becomes
possible. He must learn to see in karma a universal law of nature, and learn
also, as in face of nature as a whole, that conquest of and rule over her can
only be gained by obedience.( “Nature is conquered by obedience”.)
In
order to understand karma, the student must begin with a clear view of certain
fundamental principles, from the lack of which many remain constantly
bewildered, asking endless questions which cannot find full solution without
the solid laying of this basis. Therefore, in this study, I begin with these,
though many of my readers will be already familiar with them, through previous
statements of others and of myself.
The
fundamental conception, on which all later right thinking on karma rests, is
that it is law – law eternal, changeless, invariable, inviolable, law which can
never be broken, existing in the nature of things, informed Theosophists say:
“You must not interfere with his karma.” But whenever a natural law is working,
you may interfere with it just so far as you can. You do not hear a person say
solemnly: “You must not interfere with the law of gravitation.” It is
understood that gravitation is one of the conditions with which one has to
reckon, and that one is perfectly at liberty to counteract any inconvenience it
may cause by setting another force against it, by building a buttress to
support that which otherwise would fall to the ground under the action of
gravitation, or in any other way.
When
a condition in nature incommodes us, we use our intelligence to circumvent it,
and no one ever dreams of telling us that we must not “interfere with” or
change any condition which we dislike. We can only interfere when we have
knowledge, for we cannot annihilate any natural force, nor prevent it from
acting. But we can neutralize, we can turn aside, its action if we have at
command another sufficient force, and while I will never abate for us one jot
of its activity, it can be held up, opposed, circumvented, exactly according to
our knowledge of its nature and working, and the forces at our disposal. Karma
is no more “sacred” than any other natural law; all laws of nature are
expressions of the divine nature, and we live and move within them; but they
are not mandatory; they are forces which set up conditions amid which we live,
and which work in us as well as outside of us; we can manipulate them; we
understand them, and as our intelligence unfolds we become more and more their
masters, until the man becomes superman, and material nature becomes his
servant.
Comments
Post a Comment