AVATARAS/PART 2
SECOND
LECTURE
The
Source of and Need for Avataras
Brothers: — You will remember that
yesterday, in dividing the subject under different heads, I put down certain
questions which we would take in order. We dealt yesterday with the question:
"What is an Avatara?" The second question that we are to try to
answer, "What is the source of Avataras?" is a question that leads us
deep into the mysteries of the kosmos, and needs at least an outline of kosmic
growth and evolution in order to give an intelligible answer. I hope to-day to
be able also to deal with the succeeding question, "How does the need for
Avataras arise?" This will leave us for to-morrow the subject of the
special Avataras, and I shall endeavour, if possible, during to-morrow's discourse,
to touch on nine of the Avataras out of the ten recognised as standing out from
all other manifestations of the Supreme. Then, if I am able to accomplish that
task, we shall still have one morning left, and that I propose to give entirely
to the study of the greatest of the Avataras, the Lord Shri Krishna Himself,
endeavouring, if possible, to mark out the great characteristics of His life
and His work, and, it may be, to meet and answer some of the objections of the
ignorant which, especially in these later days, have been levelled against Him
by those who understand nothing of His nature, nothing of the mighty work He
came to accomplish in the world.
Now we are to begin to-day by seeking
an answer to the question, "What is the source of Avataras?" and it
is likely that I am going to take a line of thought somewhat unfamiliar,
carrying us, as it does, outside the ordinary lines of our study which deals
more with the evolution of man, of the spiritual nature within him. It carries
us to those far off times, almost incomprehensible to us, when our universe was
coming into manifestation, when its very foundations, as it were, were being
laid. In answering the question, however, the mere answer is simple. It is
recognised in all religions admitting divine incarnations — and they include
the great religions of the world — it is admitted that the source of Avataras,
the source of the Divine incarnations, is the second or middle manifestation of
the sacred Triad. It matters not whether with Hindus we speak of the Trimurti,
or whether with Christians we speak of the Trinity, the fundamental idea is one
and the same. Taking first for a moment the Christian symbology, you will find
that every Christian tells you that the one divine incarnation acknowledged in
Christianity — for in Christianity they believe in one special incarnation only
— you will find in the Christian nomenclature the divine incarnation or Avatara
is that of the second person of the Trinity. No Christian will tell you that
there has ever been an incarnation of God the Father, the primeval Source of
life. They will never tell you that there has been an incarnation of the third
Person of the Trinity, the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Wisdom, of creative
Intelligence, who built up the world-materials. But they will always say that
it was the second Person, the Son, who took human form, who appeared under the
likeness of humanity, who was manifested as man for helping the salvation of
the world. And if you analyse what is meant by that phrase, what, to the mind
of the Christian, is conveyed by the thought of the second Person of the
Trinity — for remember in dealing with a religion that is not yours you should
seek for the thought not the form, you should look at the idea not at the
label, for the thoughts are universal while the forms divide, the ideas are
identical while the labels are marks of separation — if you seek for the
underlying thought you will find it is this: the sign of the second Person of
the Trinity is duality; also, He is the underlying life of the world; by His
power the worlds were made, and are sustained, supported, and protected. You
will find that while the Spirit of Wisdom is spoken of as bringing order out of
disorder, kosmos out of chaos, that it is by the manifested Word of God, or the
second Person of the Trinity, it is by Him that all forms are builded up in
this world, and it is specially in His image that man is made. So also when we
turn to what will be more familiar to the vast majority of you, the symbology
of Hinduism, you will find that all Avataras have their source in Vishnu, in
Him who pervades the universe, as the very name Vishnu implies, who is the
Supporter, the Protector, the pervading, all-permeating Life by which the
universe is held together, and by which it is sustained. Taking the names of
the Trimurti so familiar to us all — not the philosophical names Sat, Chit,
Ananda, those names which in philosophy show the attributes of the Supreme
Brahman — taking the concrete idea, we have Mahadeva or Shiva, Vishnu, and
Brahma: three names, just as in the other religion we have three names; but the
same fact comes out, that it is the middle or central one of the Three who is
the source of Avataras. There has never been a direct Avatara of Mahadeva, of
Shiva Himself. Appearances? Yes. Manifestations? Yes. Coming in form for a
special purpose served by that form? Oh yes. Take the Mahabharata, and you find
Him appearing in the form of the hunter, the Kirata, and testing the intuition
of Arjuna, and struggling with him to test his strength, his courage, and
finally his devotion to Himself. But that is a mere form taken for a purpose
and cast aside the moment the purpose is served; almost, we may say, a mere
illusion, produced to serve a special purpose and then thrown away as having
completed that which it was intended to perform. Over and over again you find
such appearances of Mahadeva. You may remember one most beautiful story, in
which He appears in the form of a Chandala [An outcaste, equivalent to a
scavenger ] at the gateway of His own city of Kashi, when one who was
especially overshadowed by a manifestation of Himself, Shri Shankaracharya, was
coming with his disciples to the sacred city; veiling Himself in the form of an
outcaste — for to Him all forms are the same, the human differences are but as
the grains of sand which vanish before the majesty of His greatness — He rolled
Himself in the dust before the gateway, so that the great teacher could not
walk across without touching Him, and he called to the Chandala to make way in
order that the brahmana might go on unpolluted by the touch of the outcaste;
then the Lord, speaking through the form He had chosen, rebuked the very one
whom His power overshadowed, asking him questions which he could not answer and
thus abasing his pride and teaching him humility. Such forms truly He has
taken, but these are not what we can call Avataras; mere passing forms, not
manifestations upon earth where a life is lived and a great drama is played out
So with Brahma; He also has appeared from time to time, has manifested Himself
for some special purpose; but there is no Avatara of Brahma, which we can speak
of by that very definite and well understood term.
Now for this fact there must be some
reason. Why is it that we do not find the source of Avataras alike in all these
great divine manifestations? Why do they come from only one aspect and that the
aspect of Vishnu? I need not remind you that there is but one Self, and that
these names we use are the names of the aspects that are manifested by the Supreme;
we must not separate them so much as to lose sight of the underlying unity. For
remember how, when a worshipper of Vishnu had a feeling in his heart against a
worshipper of Mahadeva, as he bowed before the image of Hari, the face of the
image divided itself in half, and Shiva or Hara appeared on one side and Vishnu
or Hari appeared on the other, and the two, smiling as one face on the bigoted
worshipper, told him that Mahadeva and Vishnu were but one. But in Their
functions a division arises; They manifest along different lines, as it were,
in the kosmos and for the helping of man; not for Him but for us, do these
lines of apparent separateness arise.
Looking thus at it, we shall be able
to find the answer to our question, not only who is the source of Avataras, but
why Vishnu is the source. And it is here that I come to the unfamiliar part
where I shall have to ask for your special attention as regards the building of
the universe. Now I am using the word "universe", in the sense of our
solar system. There are many other systems, each of them complete in itself,
and, therefore, rightly spoken of as a kosmos, a universe. But each of these
systems in its turn is part of a mightier system, and our sun, the centre of
our own system, though it be in very truth the manifested physical body of
Ishwara Himself, is not the only sun. If you look through the vast fields of
space, myriads of suns are there, each one the centre of its own system, of its
own universe; and our sun, supreme to us, is but, as it were, a planet in a
vaster system, its orbit curved round a sun greater than itself. So in turn
that sun, round which our sun is circling, is planet to a yet mightier sun, and
each set of systems in its turn circles round a more central sun, and so on —
we know not how far may stretch the chain that to us is illimitable: for who is
able to plumb the depths and heights of space, or to find a manifested
circumference which takes in all universes! Nay, we say that they are infinite
in number, and that there is no end to the manifestations of the one Life.
Now that is true physically. Look at
the physical universe with the eye of spirit, and you see in it a picture of
the spiritual universe. A great word was spoken by one of the Masters or
Rishis, whom in this Society we honour and whose teachings we follow. Speaking
to one of His disciples, or pupils, He rebuked him, because, He said in words
never to be forgotten by those who have read them: "You always look at the
things of the spirit with the eyes of the flesh. What you ought to do is to
look at the things of the flesh with the eyes of the spirit". Now, what
does that mean? It means that instead of trying to degrade the spiritual and to
limit it within the narrow bounds of the physical, and to say of the spiritual
that it cannot be because the human brain is unable clearly to grasp it, we
ought to look at the physical universe with a deeper insight and see in it the
image, the shadow, the reflection of the spiritual world, and learn the
spiritual verities by studying the images that exist of them in the physical
world around us. The physical world is easier to grasp. Do not think the
spiritual is modelled on the physical; the physical is fundamentally modelled
on the spiritual, and if you look at the physical with the eye of spirit, then
you find that it is the image of the higher, and then you are able to grasp the
higher truth by studying the faint reflections that you see in the world around
you. That is what I ask you to do now. Just as you have your sun and suns, many
universes, each one part of a system mightier than itself, so in the spiritual
universe there is hierarchy beyond hierarchy of spiritual intelligences who are
as the suns of the spiritual world. Our physical system has at its centre the
great spiritual Intelligence manifested as a Trinity, the Ishvara of that
system. Then beyond Him there is a mightier Ishvara, round whom Those who are
on the level of the Ishvara of our system circle, looking to Him as Their
central life. And beyond Him yet another, and beyond Him others and others yet,
until as the physical universes are beyond our thinking, the spiritual
hierarchy stretches also beyond our thought, and, dazzled and blinded by the
splendour, we sink back to earth, as Arjuna was blinded when the Vaishnava form
shone forth on him, and we cry: "Oh! show us again Thy more limited form
that we may know it and live by it We are not yet ready for the mightier
manifestations. We are blinded, not helped, by such blaze of divine
splendour."
And so we find that if we would learn
we must limit ourselves — nay, we must try to expand ourselves — to the limits
of our own system. Why? I have met people who have not really any grasp of this
little world, this grain of dust in which they live, who cannot be content unless
you answer questions about the One Existence, the Para-Brahma, whom sages
revere in silence, not daring to speak even with illuminated mind that knows
nirvanic life and has expanded to nirvanic consciousness. The more ignorant the
man, the more he thinks he can grasp. The less he understands, the more he
resents being told that there are some things beyond the grasp of his
intellect, existences so mighty that he cannot even dream of the lowest of the
attributes that mark them out. And for myself, who know myself ignorant, who
know that many an age must pass ere I shall be able to think of dealing with
these profounder problems, I sometimes gauge the ignorance of the questioner by
the questions that he asks as to the ultimate existences, and when he wants to
know what he calls the primary origin, I know that he has not even grasped the
one-thousandth part of the origin out of which he himself has sprung.
Therefore, I say to you frankly that these mighty Ones whom we worship are the
Gods of our system; beyond them there stretch mightier Ones yet, whom, perhaps,
myriads of kalpas hence, we may begin to understand and worship.
Let us then confine ourselves to our
own system and be glad if we can catch some ray of the glory that illumines it
Vishnu has His own functions, as also have Brahma and Mahadeva. The first work
in this system is done by the third of the sacred great Ones of the Trimurti,
Brahma, as you all know, for you have read that there came forth the creative
Intelligence as the third of the divine manifestations. I care not what is the
symbology you take; perchance that of the Vishnu Purana will be most familiar,
wherein the unmanifested Vishnu is beneath the water, standing as the first of
the Trimurti, then the Lotus, standing as the second, and the opened Lotus
showing Brahma, the third, the creative Mind. You may remember that the work of
creation began with His activity. When we study from the occult standpoint in
what that activity consisted, we find it consisted in impregnating with His own
life the matter of the solar system; that He gave His own life to build up form
after form of atom, to make the great divisions in the kosmos; that He formed,
one after another, the five kinds of matter. Working by His mind — He is
sometimes spoken of as Mahat, the great One, Intelligence — He formed Tattvas
one after another. Tattvas, you may remember from last year, are the foundations
of the atoms, and there are five of them manifested at the present time. That
is His special work. Then He meditates, and forms — as thoughts — come forth.
There His manifest work may be said to end, though He maintains ever the life
of the atom. As far as the active work of the kosmos is concerned, He gives way
to the next of the great forces that is to work, the force of Vishnu. His work
is to gather together that matter that has been built, shaped, prepared,
vivified, and build it into definite forms after the creative ideas brought
forth by the meditation of Brahma. He gives to matter a binding force; He gives
to it those energies that hold form together. No form exists without Him,
whether it be moving or unmoving. How often does Shri Krishna, speaking as the
supreme Vishnu, lay stress on this fact He is the life in every form; without
it the form could not exist, without it it would go back to its primeval
elements and no longer live as form. He is the all-pervading life; the
"Supporter of the Universe" is one of His names. Mahadeva has a
different function in the universe; especially is He the great Yogi; especially
is He the great Teacher, the Mahaguru; He is sometimes called Jagatguru, the
Teacher of the world. Over and over again — to take a comparatively modern
example, as the Gurugita — we find Him as Teacher, to whom Parvati goes asking
for instruction as to the nature of the Guru. He it is who defines the Guru's
work, He it is who inspires the Guru's teaching. Every Guru on earth is a reflection
of Mahadeva, and it is His life which he is commissioned to give out to the
world. Yogi, immersed in contemplation, taking the ascetic form always — that
marks out His functions. For the symbols by which the mighty Ones are shown in
the teachings are not meaningless, but are replete with the deepest meaning.
And when you see Him represented as the eternal Yogi, with the cord in His
hand, sitting as an ascetic in contemplation, it means that He is the supreme
ideal of the ascetic life, and that men who come especially under His influence
must pass out of home, out of family, out of the normal ties of evolution, and
give themselves to a life of asceticism, to a life of renunciation, to share,
however feebly, in that mighty yoga by which the universe is kept alive.
He then manifests not as Avatara, but
such manifestations come from Him who is the God, the Spirit, of evolution, who
evolves all forms. That is why from Vishnu all these Avataras come. For it is
He who by His infinite love dwells in every form that He has made; with
patience that nothing can exhaust, with love that nothing can tire, with quiet,
calm endurance which no folly of man can shake from its eternal peace. He lives
in every form, moulding it as it will bear the moulding, shaping it as it
yields itself to His impulse, binding Himself, limiting Himself in order that
His universe may grow, Lord of eternal life and bliss, dwelling in every form.
If you grasp this, it is not difficult to say why from Him alone the Avataras
come. Who else should take form save the One who gives form? Who else should
work with this unending love save He, who, while the universe exists, binds
Himself that the universe may live and ultimately share His freedom? He is
bound that the universe may be free. Who else then should come forth when
special need arises?
And He gives the great types. Let me
remind you of the Shrimad-Bhagavata, where in an early chapter of the first
Book, the 3rd chapter, a very long list is given of the forms that Vishnu took,
not only the great Avataras, but also a large number of others. It is said He
appeared as Nara and Narayana; it is said He appeared as Kapila; He took female
forms, and so on, a whole long list being given of the shapes that He assumed.
And, turning from that to a very illuminative passage in the Mahabharata, we
find Him in the form of Shri Krishna explaining a profound truth to Arjuna.
There He gives the law of these
appearances: "When, O son of Pritha, I live in the order of the deities,
then I act in every respect as a deity. When I live in the order of the
Gandharvas, then I act in every respect as a Gandharva. When I live in the
order of the Nagas, I act as a Naga. When I live in the order of the Yakshas,
or that of the Rakshasas, I act after the manner of that order. Born now in the
order of humanity, I must act as a human being." A profound truth, a truth
that few in modern times recognise. Every type in the universe, in its own
place, is good; every type in the universe, in its own place, is necessary.
There is no life save His life; how then could any type come into existence
apart from the universal life, bereft whereof nothing can exist?
We speak of good forms and evil, and
rightly, as regards our own evolution. But from the wider standpoint of the
kosmos, good and evil are relative terms, and everything is very good in the
sight of the Supreme who lives in every one. How can a type come into existence
in which He cannot live? How can anything live and move, save as it has its
being in Him? Each type has its work; each type has its place; the type of the
Rakshasa as much as the type of the Deva, of the Asura as much as of the Sura.
Let me give you one curious little simple example, which yet has a certain
graphic force. You have a pole you want to move, and that pole is on a pivot,
like the mountain which churned the ocean, a pole with its two ends, positive
and negative we will call them. The positive end, we will say, is pushed in the
direction of the river (the river flowing beyond one end of the hall at Adyar).
The negative pole is pushed — in what direction? In the opposite. And those who
are pushing it have their faces turned in the opposite direction. One man looks
at the river, the other man has his back to it, looking in the opposite
direction. But the pole turns in the one direction although they push in
opposite directions. They are working round the same circle, and the pole goes
faster because it is pushed from its two ends. There is the picture of our
universe. The positive force you call the Deva or Sura; his face is turned, it
seems, to God. The negative force you call the Rakshasa or Asura; his face, it
seems, is turned away from God. Ah no! God is everywhere, in every point of the
circle round which they tread; and they tread His circle and do His will and no
otherwise; and all at length find rest and peace in Him.
Therefore Shri Krishna Himself can
incarnate in the form of Rakshasa, and when in that form He will act as
Rakshasa and not as Deva, doing that part of the divine work with the same perfection
as He does the other, which men in their limited vision call the good. A great
truth hard to grasp. I shall have to return to it presently in speaking of
Ravana, one of the mightiest types of, perhaps the greatest of, all the
Rakshasas. And we shall see, if we can follow, how the profound truth works out
But remember, if in the minds of some of you there is some hesitation in
accepting this, that the words that I read are not mine, but those of the Lord
who spoke of His own embodying; He has left on record for your teaching, that
He has embodied Himself in the form of Rakshasa and has acted after the manner
of that order.
Leaving that for a moment, there is
one other point I must take, ere speaking of the need for Avataras. and it is
this: when the great central Deities have manifested, then there come forth
from Them seven Deities of what we may call the second order. In Theosophy,
they are spoken of as the planetary Logoi, to distinguish them from the great
solar Logoi, the central Life. Each of These has to do with one of the seven
sacred planets, and with the chain of worlds connected with that planet. Our
world is one of the links in this chain, and you and I pass round this chain in
successive incarnations in the great stages of life. The world — our present
world — is the midway globe of one such chain. One Logos of the secondary order
presides over the evolution of this chain of worlds. He shows out three
aspects, reflections of the great Logoi who are at the centre of the system.
You have read perhaps of the seven-leaved lotus, the Saptaparnapadma; looked at
with the higher sight, gazed at with the open vision of the seer, that mighty
group of creative and directing Beings looks like the lotus with its seven
leaves and the great Ones are at the heart of the lotus. It is as though you
could see a vast lotus-flower spread out in space, the tips of the seven leaves
being the mighty Intelligences presiding over the evolution of the chains of
worlds. That lotus symbol is no mere symbol but a high reality, as seen in that
wondrous world wherefrom the symbol has been taken by the sages. And because
the great Rishis of old saw with the open eye of knowledge, saw the
lotus-flower spread in space, they took it as the symbol of kosmos, the lotus
with its seven leaves, each one a mighty Deva presiding over a separate line of
evolution. We are primarily concerned with our own planetary Deva and through
Him with the great Devas of the solar system.
Now my reason for mentioning this is
to explain one word that has puzzled many students. Mahavishnu, the great
Vishnu, why that particular epithet? What does it mean when that phrase is
used? It means the great solar Logos, Vishnu in His essential nature: but there
is a reflection of His glory, a reflection of His power, of His love, in more
immediate connection with ourselves and our own world. He is His
representative, as a viceroy may represent the king. Some of the Avataras we
shall find came forth from Mahavishnu through the planetary Logos, who is
concerned with our evolution and the evolution of the world. But the
Purnavatara that I spoke of yesterday comes forth directly from Mahavishnu,
with no intermediary between Himself and the world that He comes to help. Here
is another distinction between the Purnavatara and those more limited ones,
that I could not mention yesterday, because the words used would, at that
stage, have been unintelligible. We shall find to-morrow, when we come to deal
with the Avataras Matsya, Kurma, and so on, that these special Avataras,
connected with the evolution of certain types in the world, while indirectly
from Mahavishnu, come through the mediation of His mighty representative for
our own chain, the wondrous Intelligence that conveys His love and ministers
His will, and is the channel of His all-pervading and supporting power. When we
come to study Shri Krishna we shall find that there is no intermediary. He
stands as the Supreme Himself. And while in the other cases there is the
Presence that may be recognised as an intermediary, it is absent in the case of
the great Lord of Life.
Leaving that for further elaboration
then to-morrow, let us try to answer the next question, "How arises this
need for Avataras?" because in the minds of some, quite naturally, a
difficulty does arise. The difficulty that many thoughtful people feel may be
formulated thus: "Surely the whole plan of the world is in the mind of the
Logos from the beginning, and surely we cannot suppose that He is working like
a human workman, not thoroughly understanding that at which He aims. He must be
the architect as well as the builder; He must make the plan as well as carry it
out He is not like the mason who puts a stone in the wall where he is told, and
knows nothing of the architecture of the building to which he is contributing.
He is the master-builder, the great architect of the universe, and everything
in the plan of that universe must be in His mind ere ever the universe began.
But if that be so — and we cannot think otherwise — how is it that the need for
special intervention arises? Does not the fact of special intervention imply
some unforeseen difficulty that has arisen? If there must be a kind of
interference with the working out of the plan, does that not look as if in the
original plan some force was left out of account, some difficulty had not been
seen, something had arisen for which preparation had not been made? If it be
not so, why the need for interference, which looks as though it were brought
about to meet an unforeseen event?" A natural, reasonable, and perfectly
fair question. Let us try to answer it. I do not believe in shirking
difficulties; it is better to look them in the face, and see if an answer be
possible.
Now the answer comes along three
different lines. There are three great classes of facts, each of which
contributes to the necessity; and each, foreseen by the Logos, is definitely
prepared for as needing a particular manifestation.
The first of these lines arises from
what I may perhaps call the nature of things. I remarked at the beginning of
this lecture on the fact that our universe, our system, is part of a greater
whole, not separate, not independent, not primary, in comparatively a low scale
in the universe, our sun a planet in a vaster system. Now what does that imply?
As regards matter, Prakriti, it implies that our system is builded out of
matter already existing, out of matter already gifted with certain properties,
out of matter that spreads through all space, and from which every Logos takes
His materials, modifying it according to His own plan and according to His own
will. When we speak of Mulaprakriti, the root of matter, we do not mean that it
exists as the matter we know. No philosopher, no thinker would dream of saying
that that which spreads throughout space is identical with the matter of our
very elementary solar system. It is the root of matter, that of which all forms
of matter are merely modifications. What does that imply? It implies that our
great Lord, who brought our solar system into existence, is taking matter which
already has certain properties given to it by One yet mightier than Himself. In
that matter three gunas exist in equilibrium, and it is the breath of the Logos
that throws them out of equilibrium, and causes the motion by which our system
is brought into existence. There must be a throwing out of equilibrium, for
equilibrium means Pralaya, where there is not motion, nor any manifestation of
life and form. When life and form come forth, equilibrium must have been
disturbed, and motion must be liberated by which the world shall be built But
the moment you grasp that truth you see that there must be certain limitations
by virtue of the very material in which the Deity is working for the making of
the system. It is true that when out of His system, when not conditioned and
confined and limited by it, as He is by His most gracious will, it is true that
He would be the Lord of that matter by virtue of His union with the mightier
Life beyond; but when for the building of the world He limits Himself within His
Maya, then He must work within the conditions of those materials that limit His
activity, as we are told over and over again.
Now when in the ceaseless interplay
of Sattva, Rajas, and Tamas, Tamas has the ascendancy, aided and, as it were,
worked by Rajas, so that they predominate over Sattva in the foreseen
evolution, when the two combining overpower the third, when the force of Rajas
and the inertia and stubbornness of Tamas, binding themselves together, check
the action, the harmony, the pleasure-giving qualities of Sattva, then comes
one of the conditions in which the Lord comes forth to restore that which had
been disturbed of the balanced interworking of the three gunas, and to make
again such balance between them as shall enable evolution to go forward
smoothly and not be checked in its progress. He re-establishes the balance of
power which gives orderly motion, the order having been disturbed by the
co-operation of the two in contradistinction to the third. In these fundamental
attributes of matter, the three gunas lies the first reason of the need for
Avataras.
The second need has to do with man
himself, and now we come back in both the second and the third to that question
of good and evil, of which I have already spoken, Ishvara, when He came to deal
with the evolution of man — with all reverence I say it — had a harder task to
perform than in the evolution of the lower forms of life. On them the law is
imposed and they must obey its impulse. On the mineral the law is compulsory;
every mineral moves according to the law, without interposing any impulse from
itself to work against the will of the One. In the vegetable world the law is
imposed, and every plant grows in orderly method according to the law within
it, developing steadily and in the fashion of its order, interposing no impulse
of its own. Nay, in the animal world — save perhaps when we come to its highest
members — the law is still a force overpowering everything else, sweeping
everything before it, carrying along all living things. A wheel turning on the
road might carry with it on its axle the fly that happened to have settled
there; it does not interpose any obstacle to the turning of the wheel. If the
fly comes on to the circumference of the wheel and opposes itself to its
motion, it is crushed without the slightest jarring of the wheel that rolls on,
and the form goes out of existence, and the life takes other shapes.
So is the wheel of law in the three
lower kingdoms. But with man it is not so. In man Ishvara sets himself to
produce an image of Himself, which is not the case in the lower kingdoms. As
life has evolved, one force after another has come out, and in man there begins
to come out the central life, for the time has arrived for the evolution of the
sovereign power of will, the self-initiated motion which is part of the life of
the Supreme. Do not misunderstand me — for the subject is a subtle one; there
is only one will in the universe, the will of Ishvara, and all must conform
itself to that will, all is conditioned by that will, all must move according
to that will, and that will marks out the straight line of evolution. There may
be swerving neither to the right hand nor to the left There is one will only
which in its aspect to us is free, but inasmuch as our life is the life of
Ishvara Himself, inasmuch as there is but one Self and that Self is yours and
mine as much as His — for He has given us His very Self to be our Self and our
life — there must evolve at one stage of this wondrous evolution that royal
power of will which is seen in Him. And from the Atma within us, which is
Himself in us, there flows forth the sovereign will into the sheaths in which
the Atma is as it were held. Now what happens is this: force goes out through
the sheaths and gives them some of its own nature, and each sheath begins to
set up a reflection of the will on its own account, and you get the
"I" of the body which wants to go this way, and the "I" of
passion or emotion which wants to go that way, and the "I" of the
mind which wants to go a third way, and none of these ways is the way of the
Atma, the Supreme. These are the illusory wills of man, and there is one way in
which you may distinguish them from the true will. Each of them is determined
in its direction by external attraction; the man's body wants to move in a
particular way because something attracts it, or something else repels it: it
moves to what it likes, to what is congenial to it. it moves away from that
which it dislikes, from that from which it feels itself repelled. But that motion
of the body is but motion determined by the Ishvara outside, as it were, rather
than by the Ishvara within, by the kosmos around and not by the Self within,
which has not yet achieved its mastery of the kosmos. So with the emotions or
passions: they are drawn this way or that by the objects of the senses, and the
"senses move after their appropriate objects"; it is not the
"I", the Self, which moves. And so also with the mind. "The mind
is fickle and restless, O Krishna, it seems as hard to curb as the wind",
and the mind lets the senses run after objects as a horse that has broken its
reins flies away with the unskilled driver. All these forces are set up; and
there is one more thing to remember. These forces reinforce the rajasic guna
and help to bring about that predominance of which I spoke; all these reckless
desires that are not according to the one will are yet necessary in order that
the will may evolve and in order to train and develop the man.
Do you say why? How would you learn
right if you knew not wrong? How would you choose good if you knew not evil?
How would you recognise the light if there were no darkness? How would you move
if there were no resistance? The forces that are called dark, the forces of the
Rakshasas, of the Asuras, of all that seem to be working against Ishvara —
these are the forces that call out the inner strength of the Self in man, by
struggling with which the forces of Atma within the man are developed, and
without which he would remain in Pralaya for evermore. It is a perfectly
stagnant pool where there is no motion, and there you get corruption and not
life. The evolution of force can only be made by struggle, by combat, by
effort, by exercise, and inasmuch as Ishvara is building men and not babies, He
must draw out men's forces by pulling against their strength, making them
struggle in order to attain, and so vivifying into outer manifestation the life
that otherwise would remain enfolded in itself. In the seed the life is hidden,
but it will not grow, if you leave the seed alone. Place it on this table here,
and come back a century hence, and, if you find it, it will be a seed still and
nothing more. So also is the Atma in man ere evolution and struggle have begun.
Plant your seed in the ground, so that the forces in the ground press on it,
and the rays of the sun from outside make vibrations that work on it, and the
water from the rain comes through the soil into it and forces it to swell —
then the seed begins to grow; but as it begins to grow it finds the earth
around. How shall it grow but by pushing at it and so bringing out the energies
of life that are within it? And against the opposition of the ground the roots
strike down, and against the opposition of the ground the growing point mounts
upward, and by the opposition of the ground the forces are evolved that make
the seed grow, and the little plant appears above the soil. Then the wind comes
and blows and tries to drag it away, and, in order that it may live and not
perish, it strikes its roots deeper and gives itself a better hold against the
battering force of the wind, and so the tree grows against the forces which try
to tear it out And if these forces were not, there would have been no growth of
the root And so with the root of Ishvara, the life within us; were everything
around us smooth and easy, we would remain supine, lethargic, indifferent It is
the whip of pain, of suffering, of disappointment, that drives us onward and
brings out the forces of our internal life which otherwise would remain
undeveloped. Would you have a man grow? Then don't throw him on a couch with
pillows on every side, and bring his meals and put them into his mouth, so that
he moves not limb nor exercises mind. Throw him on a desert, where there is no
food nor water to be found; let the sun beat down on his head, the wind blow
against him; let his mind be made to think how to meet the necessities of the
body, and the man grows into a man and not a log. That is why there are forces
which you call evil. In this universe there is no evil; all is good that comes
to us from Ishvara, but it sometimes comes in the guise of evil that, by
opposing it, we may draw out our strength. Then we begin to understand that
these forces are necessary, and that they are within the plan of Ishvara. They
test evolution, they strengthen evolution, so that it does not take the next
step onward till it has strength enough to hold its own, one step made firm by
opposition before the next is taken. But when, by the conflicting wills of men,
the forces that work for retardation, to keep a man back till he is able to
overcome them and go on, when they are so reinforced by men's unruly wishes
that they are beginning, as it were, to threaten progress, then ere that check
takes place, there is reinforcement from the other side: the presence of the
Avatara of the forces that threaten evolution calls forth the presence of the
Avatara that leads to the progress of humanity.
We come to the third cause. The
Avatara does not come forth without a call. The earth, it is said, is very
heavy with its load of evil, "Save us, O supreme Lord", the Devas
come and cry. In answer to that cry the Lord comes forth. But what is this that
I spoke of purposely by a strange phrase to catch your attention, that I spoke
of as an Avatara of evil? By the will of the one Supreme, there is one
incarnated in form who gathers up together the forces that make for
retardation, in order that, thus gathered together, they may be destroyed by
the opposing force of good, and thus the balance may be re-established and
evolution go on along its appointed road. Devas work for joy, the reward of
Heaven. Svarga is their home, and they serve the Supreme for the joys that
there they have. Rakshasas also serve Him, first for rule on earth, and power
to grasp and hold and enjoy as they will in this lower world. Both sides serve
for reward, and are moved by the things that please.
And in order, as our time is drawing
to a close, that I may take one great example to show how these work, let me
take the mighty one, Ravana of Lanka, that we may give a concrete form to a
rather difficult and abstruse thought. Ravana, as you all know, was the mighty
intelligence, the Rakshasa, who called forth the coming of Shri Rama. But look
back into the past, and what was he? Keeper of Vishnu's heaven, door-keeper of
the mighty Lord, devotee, bhakta, absolutely devoted to the Lord. Look at his
past, and where do you find a bhakta of Mahadeva more absolute in devotion than
the one who came forth later as Ravana? It was he who cast his head into the
fire in order that Mahadeva might be served. It is he in whose name have been
written some of the most exquisite stotras, breathing the spirit of completest
devotion; in one of them, you may remember — and you could scarcely carry
devotion to a further point — it is in the mouth of Ravana words are put
appealing to Mahadeva, and describing Him as surrounded by forms the most
repellent and undesirable, surrounded on every side by pisachas and bhutas,
[Goblins and elementals ] which to us seem but the embodiment of the dark
shadows of the burning ghat, forms from which all beauty is withdrawn. He cries
out in a passion of love:
Better wear pisacha-form, so we
Evermore are near and wait on Thee.
How did he then come to be the
ravisher of Sita and the enemy of God?
You know how through lack of
intuition, through lack of power to recognise the meaning of an order,
following the words not the spirit, following the outside not the inner, he
refused to open the door of heaven when Sanat Kumara came and demanded
entrance. In order that that which was lacking might be filled, in order that
that which was wanting might be earned, that which was called a curse was
pronounced, a curse which was the natural reaction from the mistake. He was
asked: "Will you have seven incarnations friendly to Vishnu, or three in
which you will be His enemy and oppose Him?" And because he was a true
bhakta, and because every moment of absence, from his Lord meant to him hell of
torture, he chose three of enmity, which would let him go back sooner to the
Feet of the Beloved, rather than the seven of happiness, of friendliness.
Better a short time of utter enmity than a longer remaining away with apparent
happiness. It was love not hatred that made him choose the form of a Rakshasa
rather than the form of a Rishi. There is the first note of explanation.
Then, coming into the form of
Rakshasa, he must do his duty as Rakshasa. This was no weak man to be swayed by
momentary thought, by transient objects. He had all the learning of the Vedas.
With him, it was said, passed away Vedic learning, with him it disappeared from
earth. He knew his duty. What was his duty? To put forward every force which
was in his mighty nature in order to check evolution, and so call out every
force in man which could be called out by opposing energy which had to be
overcome; to gather round him all the forces which were opposing evolution; to
make himself king of the whole, centre and law-giver to every force that was
setting itself against the will of the Lord; to gather them together as it were
into one head, to call them together into one arm; so that when their apparent
triumph made the cry of the earth go up to Vishnu, the answer might come in
Rama's Avatara and they be destroyed, that the life-wave might go on.
Nobly he did the work, thoroughly he
discharged his duty. It is said that even sages are confused about Dharma, and
truly it is subtle and hard to grasp in its entirety, though the fragment the
plain man sees be simple enough. His Dharma was the Dharma of a Rakshasa, to
lead the whole forces of evil against One whom in his inner soul, then clouded,
he loved. When Shri Rama came, when He was wandering in the forest, how could
he sting Him into leaving the life of His life. His beloved Sita, and into
coming out into the world to do His work? By taking away from Him the one thing
to which He clung, by taking away from Him the wife whom He loved as His very
Self, by placing her in the spot where all the forces of evil were gathered
together, so making one head for destruction, which the arrow of Shri Rama
might destroy. Then the mighty battle, then the struggle with all the forces of
his great nature, that the law might be obeyed to the uttermost, duly fulfilled
to the last grain, the debt paid that was owed; and then — ah then! the shaft
of the Beloved, then the arrow of Shri Rama that struck off the head from the
seeming enemy, from the real devotee. And from the corpse of the Rakshasa that
fell upon the field near Lanka, the devotee went up to Goloka [A name for one
of the heavens.] to sit at the feet of the Beloved, and rest for awhile till
the third incarnation had to be lived out.
Such then are some of the reasons by,
the ways in which the coming of the Avatara is brought about And my last word
to you, my brothers, to-day is but a sentence, in order to avoid the
possibility of a mistake to which our diving into these depths of thought may
possibly give rise. Remember that though all powers are His, all forces His,
Rakshasa as much as Deva, Asura as much as Sura; remember that for your
evolution you must be on the side of good, and struggle to the utmost against
evil. Do not let the thoughts I have put lead you into a bog, into a pit of
hell, in which you may for the time perish, that because evil is relative,
because it exists by the one will, because Rakshasa is His as much as Deva,
therefore you shall go on their side and walk along their path. It is not so.
If you yield to ambition, if you yield to pride, if you set yourselves against
the will of Ishvara, if you struggle for the separated self, if in yourselves
now you identify yourself with the past in which you have dwelt instead of with
the future towards which you should be directing your steps, then, if your
Karma be at a certain stage, you pass into the ranks of those who work as
enemies, because you have chosen that fate for yourself, at the promptings of
the lower nature. Then with bitter inner pain — even if with complete
submission — accepting the Karma, but with profound sorrow, you shall have to
work out your own will against the will of the Beloved, and feel the anguish of
the rending that separates the inner from the outer life. The will of Ishvara
for you is evolution; these forces are made to help your evolution — but only
if you strive against them. If you yield to them, then they carry you away. You
do not then call out your own strength, but only strengthen them. Therefore, O
Arjuna, stand up and fight. Do not be supine; do not yield yourself to the
forces; they are there to call out your energies by opposition and you must not
sink down on the floor of the chariot And my last word is the word of Shri
Krishna to Arjuna: "Take up your bow, stand up and fight."
Comments
Post a Comment