SOME GLIMPSES OF OCCULTISM/PART 7
CHAPTER VII
TELEPATHY AND MIND-CURE
Let
us commence by defining the meaning of our terms. The term telepathy is derived
from two Greek words, and its literal meaning is “feeling at a distance,” but
it is now generally used almost synonymously with thought-transference, and may
be taken to cover any transfer of an image, a thought or a sensation from one
person to another by non-physical means – means unknown to ordinary science.
The word “mind-cure” bears its meaning on its face – unless indeed one reverses
the arrangement of the words; it does not mean a cure for a mind diseased, but
the curing of physical ills by the use of the mind, or at least by distinctly
non-physical means. So we see that both these subjects are closely connected
with the influence and power of thought, and a comprehension of them will
therefore largely depend upon thoroughly understanding these latter questions.
Let us spend a few minutes, then, in considering exactly how we think.
To
us thought seems an instantaneous process; we have a proverb “quick as
thought,” Yet, rapid though it be, it is more complicated than we suppose. In
that respect it resembles the process by which sensation reaches the brain from
the different parts of the body. We commonly think of that also as almost
instantaneous, but science assures us that it is not so in reality. When, for
example, we grasp something which is too hot, we quickly drop it; yet in that
moment of time two distinct transactions have taken place. The nerves of the
hand have, as it were, telegraphed to the brain the message, “This object is
too hot,” and the brain has sent back the answer, “Then drop it,” and it is
only in response to this order that the hand relaxes, and the object is released.
The rate at which these messages travel has been measured by students of
physics, so that the time occupied is appreciable by their instruments, though
to us it seems indistinguishable.
How
We Think
An
analogous process takes place every time we think, though in this case it needs
clairvoyant sight to watch what happens. To one who possesses the sight of the
mental plane, thought is distinguishable in its formation as a vibration of the
matter of the mental body of the thinker. Then it is observable that by that
vibration another is set up – a vibration an octave lower, as it were, in the
grosser matter of the thinker’s astral body, and from that in turn the etheric
particles of the man’s brain are affected, and through them at last the denser
grey matter is brought into action. All these successive steps must be taken
before a thought can be translated into action on the physical plane; it may be
said that the thought has to pass through two whole planes and part of another
before it can come into effect down here. I must describe to you how this
appears from the clairvoyant point of view, so that you may have a clear mental
image before you.
Every
cell in the physical brain – every particle of its matter even – has its
corresponding and interpenetrating astral matter; and behind (or rather within)
that, it has also the still finer mental matter. The brain is a cubical mass,
but for the purposes of our examination let us suppose that it could be spread
out upon a surface so that it should be only one particle thick. Let us further
suppose that the astral and mental matter corresponding to it could also be
laid out in layers in a similar manner, the astral layer a little above the
physical, and the mental a little above the astral in turn. Then we should have
three layers of matter of different degrees of density all corresponding one to
the other, but not joined together in any way, except that here and there wires
of communication existed between the physical and astral particles, and were
continued up into the mental matter. That would fairly represent the condition
of affairs existing in the brain of the average man. In the adept, the
perfected man, every particle has its own wire, and there is full communication
in every part of the brain alike; but the ordinary man has at present only very
few of these channels of communication opened. Now we know that the brain is
mapped out into certain areas, each corresponding to a certain set of
qualities. In the perfect man all these qualities are fully developed, for the
wires belonging to all of them are active; but in the ordinary man the great
majority of the wires are as yet inactive, or hardly formed at all, and so the
qualities corresponding to them are dormant in his brain.
We
may image these wires as tubes, through which the true man within has to send
down his thoughts to his physical brain. In the developed man, each thought has
its own appropriate channel, through which it can descend directly to the
correspondingly appropriate matter in the physical brain; but in the average
man many of those channels are not yet open, and so the thought which ought to
flow through them must go a long way out of its way, as it were – must find its
expression through other and inappropriate channels, going laterally through
the brain of mental matter until it can find a way down, passing eventually
through a tube not at all suited to it, and then, when it does reach the
physical level, having to move laterally again in the physical before it
encounters the physical particles which are capable of expressing it. We see at
once how awkward and clumsy such a roundabout expression is likely to be, and
we thus understand why it is that some people have no comprehension of
mathematics, or no taste for music or art, as the case may be. The reason is
that in the part of the brain devoted to that particular quality the
communications have not yet been opened up, so that all thought connected with
that subject has to go round through unsuitable channels; the brain is not yet
in full working order, and therefore the thought cannot work freely in all
directions. The physical brain is a solid mass, and the astral and mental
brains interpenetrate it, so that the layers and tubes do not really exist; but
nevertheless the symbol is an accurate one as describing the want of
communication between the mental, astral and physical particles.
Picture
to yourself what happens when we interchange ideas down here upon the physical
plane. I formulate a thought, but before it can reach you it must pass from my
mind through the astral matter of my brain down to the physical, and be
translated into speech or writing. Then it appeals to you either through the
waves of air which strike upon the tympanum of your ear, or through the light
reflected to your eyes from the printed page; the idea enters the physical
brain, but even then it has to pass up through the astral to the mental before
it reaches the true man within, thus reversing the process which took place in
my brain when I sent out that thought. Once more you see that this is a
laborious method – that the message has to go a long way round; and it will
inevitably occur to you to ask whether this circuitous route is really
necessary – whether it is not possible to take a short cut, to tap the telegraph
wire at some intermediate point. Since the starting point and the terminus are
alike on the mental plane, since both on the way up and on the way down the
message must pass through the astral and the etheric levels, is there no
communication possible at any of these points, without lengthening the process
by descent to the physical?
Three
Types of Telepathy
There
is such a possibility; indeed, there are three such possibilities; and this is
precisely what is meant by telepathy. We may under favourable circumstances
open up a direct communication between two mental bodies, between two astral
bodies, or between two etheric brains; and this gives us three varieties of
telepathy. Let us begin with the lowest.
If I
think strongly of any simple concrete form in my physical brain, I make that
form in etheric matter, so that it can be seen by a clairvoyant; but in the
effort of making that image I send out etheric waves all around me, like the
waves which radiate from the spot where a stone falls into a pond. When these
waves strike upon another etheric brain, they tend to reproduce in it the same
image. It is not the image itself which is sent out, but a set of vibrations
which will reproduce the image. It is not like a speaking-tube, through which
the voice itself passes, and could be heard as a voice at any point of its
journey. It rather resembles a telephone, in which it is not the voice itself
which is conveyed, but a number of electrical vibrations set up by the voice,
which when they enter the receiver are transmuted into the sounds of that voice
once more. If you cut the telephone wire and listened at the end of it without
a receiver, you will hear nothing, for the vibrations are not the sound, but
under proper conditions they will reproduce the sound.
In
exactly this way a simple form may readily be transferred from one brain to
another. It is an experiment that may easily be tried, if any two people are
sufficiently interested to take a little trouble with it. One of them would
have to think strongly of some simple geometrical form, such as a cross, for
example, or a triangle, while the other would have to sit quietly, and note
what ideas formed themselves in his mind. In a number of cases such an effort
would be successful the second or third time it was tried, though of course
some people are more sensitive than others, and some people can form clearer
images than others. In this case we have come down to the etheric state of
matter, so that we are only one remove from the ordinary method of speech or
writing; in fact, what we have done is very like Marconi’s wireless telegraphy.
Let us see whether the same thing can be effected a stage earlier, at the
astral level.
Not
only can it be done, but it is constantly being done all round us, though we do
not notice it. The astral body is the vehicle of emotion and passion, as we
have seen in previous lectures, so that what is conveyed from one person to
another at this level will be an impression of a passional or emotional nature.
Notice it for yourselves in family life. When one person is in a condition of
deep depression, it will be found that others round him are liable to be
affected in the same way. If one person is especially irritable, it will soon
be observed that others in turn become less serene and more readily affected
than usual. This means that any person who gives way to a strong wave of
feeling of any sort is radiating a certain rate of astral vibration which tends
to reproduce that state of feeling in others as it impinges upon their astral bodies.
The case in which above all others this is important is with regard to the
dead, for they are living entirely in the astral vehicle, and so are more
sensitive to these waves of emotion than the living, who are to some extent
protected by the density and dullness of their physical bodies. So if a man
selfishly gives way to uncontrolled grief for the dead, he often causes his
departed friend the most acute and profound depression. On the other hand, if
he thinks of his friend with love and an earnest desire for his progress, he
may help instead of hindering, because these feelings also will faithfully
reproduce themselves in the astral body of the dead man. This is a case of real
telepathy, or “feeling at a distance.”
Now
let us advance one stage more, and see whether it is not possible that the
thought may be communicated directly from mind to mind on its own level,
without descending even so far as to the astral plane. This also can be done,
and often is done, but as a regular thing it is a means of converse for the
more exalted souls only. One who is highly developed may thus flash his ideas
through space with literally the speed of thought, but for ordinary men as yet
such power is rare. Nevertheless, it sometimes exists where there is unusually
close sympathy between two persons, and I feel sure that when mankind is
further evolved this will be our common method of communication. It is already
employed by the great Masters of Wisdom in the instruction of their pupils, and
in this way they can convey with ease the most complicated ideas.
We
have before us, then, these three kinds of telepathy, all of them consisting
simply of the conveyance of vibrations at their respective levels – liable,
perhaps, to be confused by the superficial observer, but readily
distinguishable by the trained clairvoyant. In a minor way we may find evidence
of one or other of them almost daily, for we often observe cases in which some
friend is thinking simultaneously along the same lines as ourselves – thinking,
it may be, about a subject which has not occurred to either of us for months
previously.
Mind-Cure
We
at once see how closely associated is telepathy with mind-cure, which aims to
transfer good, strong thoughts from the operator to the patient. We meet with
various types of mind-cure, differing considerably in their teachings, and
calling themselves Christian science, mental science, mind-healing, etc., but
they all agree in endeavouring to produce physical cures by non-physical means.
There seems to be a vague general opinion afloat that Theosophy is opposed to
no form of faith; on the contrary, it points out whatever is good in each of
them, emphasizes and explains it, and thus combines them all into one
harmonious whole. It objects only to misunderstanding and misuse of dogma or
practice; it seeks, not to attack these multitudinous religions, but to comprehend
them intelligently and to select from them impartially whatsoever things in
them are beautiful and true. Our belief is that it is a serious mistake for
religious people to quarrel over trifles as they do. On broad principles of
right and wrong they are all at one; they all agree that man ought to leave the
lower and seek the higher; let them then band together to convert the rest of
the world to that much of religious faith, and leave the discussion of
unimportant details until that great task is accomplished. That seems to us to
be a suggestion of the merest common-sense; yet how few can be induced to
listen to it for a moment!
So
we who study Theosophy are in no way opposed to mind-cure, though there are
some times things connected with it to which we take exception. Its leading
idea is a grand one – that of the power of thought. It is in no way new
conception, for the old religions have always taught it; you will find it, for
example, clearly laid down in the first chapter of that noble Buddhist book,
The Dhammapada, a beautiful translation of which by Sir Edwin Arnold was quoted
in my lecture on Buddhism. To claim for the mind-curists the credit of
discovering the power of thought is a mistake, and shows a sad ignorance of the
teaching of the great Oriental faiths; but it is true that they are making many
people in this country see it now for the first time. For this, then, we owe
thanks to them, that they are raising some people out of materialism, and
opening their eyes to something higher and more rational; and that is a grand
thing to do, for when it has once been done, further advance becomes possible.
All honour to them for their share in this work of elevating the thought of the
time; and though there are points in their schemes that we may criticize, let
us never forget that they have this always to their credit. Let me briefly
mention first certain dogmas of theirs with which I cannot agree, and get those
out of our way, so that afterwards we may turn to the more congenial task of
stating the ideas with which we found ourselves in sympathy.
Some
Objections to It
First,
I have never been able to see why a medical process should be erected into a
religion; one might as well make a religion of homeopathy or hydropathy. So to
those who are working upon such an unsatisfactory mental basis, I would offer
the magnificent system of philosophy which they will find in Theosophy – a
scheme which will give them food for thought, and supply them with a rational
theory of the universe. One of the principal schools of mind-cure denies
altogether the existence of matter – one which calls itself Christian science,
though it is difficult to see upon what grounds such a name was assumed, since
to deny the existence of matter is neither Christian nor scientific. Certainly
it cannot be the latter, for it is matter only that science can cognize, and
all its experiments are conducted by its means. And this doctrine of the
non-existence of material things is emphatically not Christian, but pagan, for
it is the teaching of one of the oldest Oriental systems.
There
is a grand truth behind it, if it is rightly understood. All manifestation
comes forth from the Absolute, and presumably all will one day return to Him.
All manifestation, therefore, is impermanent, and from the point of view of
eternity may be regarded as fleeting and momentary and hardly worth taking into
account at all. Still, to say that it does not exist seems to be misleading,
since it is in truth just as much one of the manifestations of the Logos as is
that spirit which is its other pole. The Lord Buddha has said that there are
two things which are eternal, akasa and nirvana; and the context seems to show
us that he means what we now call matter and force. Herein modern science
agrees with him; and it seems to me that it is both truer and safer to
recognize that while manifestation exists each type of matter is real on its
own plane. It is true that while we are on the physical plane only physical
matter is real to us, and astral and mental matter remain invisible to the
lower senses, while when we raise our consciousness to the higher planes this
condition of things is reversed; but it is the focus of our consciousness that
has changed, not the manifestation of the Logos. So while we fully recognize that
the unseen things are the most important, we yet prefer to regard matter as
real to us as long as we are upon its level. It scarcely seems sensible first
to deny the existence of the body, and then to point to an improvement in its
condition as the result of the denial of its existence; for how can one cure
that which does not exist?
I
incline to believe that this denial of matter is probably in essence a reaction
against the old and horrible theory of a personal devil. Our friends feel
intuitively that the idea of evil imposed upon us from without is an absurdity,
since every man makes his own good and evil destiny for himself; so they say
there is in truth no evil but that which we make – all is subjective; and then,
since they constantly find themselves struggling against matter and its
qualities, they make the old mistake of identifying matter with evil, and so
come to the conclusion that there is really no matter. It is strange thus to
find Bishop Berkeley’s theory reappearing amidst such different surroundings,
and we find ourselves reminded of Swift’s remark about him, “If Berkeley says
there is no matter, then surely it is no matter what he says!”
But
the point in all these theories to which I feel myself bound to take exception
is the idea of securing wealth by undue influence; there I must most
emphatically disagree altogether. Even to ask money for the use of mental power
in curing disease seems to me undesirable; to use mental power in order
unlawfully to extract it from others is a degradation and prostitution of the
higher knowledge which ought to be held sacred for unselfish work. He who would
seek wealth through mental effort should do so through legitimate channels
only, and his attempt should be rather to limit his desires than to increase
his possessions, for that alone is the path of true wisdom.
Yet
again – I know the value of strong faith and affirmation as well as any man,
yet truth forbids that I should deny that a body can ever be in ill-health. The
true man, the ego, the soul, is not ill, and if the denial is understood in
that sense there can be no objection to it. But it is not usually understood in
that sense; the statement is clearly made that the way to get rid of a headache
is to assert “I have no headache”; an assertion which may presently become
true, but is undoubtedly false when it is first made. I do not deny that by
persistently making that false statement an effect may be produced; but it
seems to me that the falsehood is a much more serious evil than the headache or
the toothache which it eventually removes. Any man may lawfully say “My head or
my tooth shall not ache,” and in thus setting his will persistently against the
pain he may probably drive it away. Such an effort of will is legitimate and
even admirable; the concentration of thought which it implies is a splendid
exercise for any man. In this way one may well think against any disease, and
thus repel its attacks, avoiding it altogether if it has not yet effected a
lodgement in the body, and greatly enhancing the effect of remedial measures if
it is already in possession. The power of thought is enormous, and can hardly
be exaggerated.
The
Power of Thought
This
brings us to that part of the teaching of the mental scientists which we can
unreservedly approve. When they exhort their clients to think always cheerful
thoughts, to cast away from them fear and worry, to avoid sedulously that
faultfinding which always intensifies the evil to which it draws attention – in
all this, and much more that they say, we have for them nothing but unstinting
praise. In one of their books I find this advice given to a man: “If you feel
depression or sad thought coming over you, think of something to be glad about,
quick! You have not time to waste over depression!” And as to fear, again and
again they assure us that most things that are feared never come to pass, and
that, whether they do or not, we double our trouble if we suffer the pain of
fearing it beforehand – all of which is true and healthy doctrine. Even this,
however, may run somewhat into extremes. I have read the statement that if men
had no fear of disease there would be no infection, which of course is not
true, since men often catch disease when they do not know of its existence. But
what is true is that the man who is fearless about a disease is much less
likely to catch it; though even then it may happen to him, if he is overtired,
if the forces of the body are not active enough to repel the infection. So that
in that exaggerated form the remark is untrue, though it has a basis of truth.
The
realization of the effect of thought upon others, and therefore of our
responsibility for our thoughts, is also admirable. We find it constantly in
the mental science literature of the better class. For example, it is stated
that “false conceptions of God, and especially belief in eternal vindictive
punishment, make their unwholesome influence felt in every bodily tissue” – a
startling and yet obvious truth, which it would be well for many people who
think themselves orthodox to take seriously to heart. Again, I find them asking
us how we can wonder that we have such an increase of all diseases among us,
especially nervous diseases, when for many generations the whole atmosphere has
been full of chronic, fearful, selfish thought about religious matters – loaded
with the thought-forms of terror-stricken men about an angry God, a horned
devil with a barbed tail, the flames of hell, and other abominable figments of
the diseased ecclesiastical imagination – an idea with much truth in it, as any
Theosophist will readily realize.
I
heartily agree also with the dictum which I find our friends laying down, that
if a man thinks himself a poor worm and a miserable sinner, full of natural
depravity, that is exactly the way to make him an unpleasant entity of that
description! If he despises himself to begin with, he is likely to become
despicable; if he respects himself he is likely to remain worthy of respect. If
he realizes himself as a spark of the Divine Life, and so knows that he can do
all things through the Christ within, which strengthen him, he is far less
likely to be swept away by the storm of passion, far less likely to yield to
the insistent temptation. It is true that we all are sinners, but we surely
need not aggravate our offences by being miserable sinners; and as to worms, we
have passed through the reptilian stage many aeons ago, and there is nothing to
be gained by talking nonsense! We are far more likely to be encouraged to
forsake sin and to rise to virtue if we comprehend our true place and dignity,
than if we believe, or profess to believe, a degrading falsehood. The
“miserable sinner” can excuse himself by taking refuge in platitudes about
human frailty: the Divine spark knows that he himself is responsible for his
own actions and his own evolution, and that he has the power to make himself
what he will.
One
passage which I met with in reading books on mental cure I should like to quote
verbatim, for it is a most beautiful idea, and as entirely Theosophical as
though it had come straight from one of our own teachers. “Knead love into the
bread you bake; wrap strength and courage in the parcel you tie for the woman
with the weary face; hand trust and candour with the coin you pay to the man
with the suspicious eyes.” Quaint in expression, but lovely in its thought;
truly the Theosophical concept that every connection is an opportunity, and
that every man whom we meet even casually is a person to be helped. Thus the
student of the Good Law goes through life distributing blessings all about him,
doing good unobtrusively everywhere, though often the recipients of the
blessing and the help may have no idea whence it comes. In such benefactions
every man can take his share, the poorest as well as the richest; all who can
think can send out kindly, helpful thoughts, and no such thought has ever
failed, or can ever fail while the laws of the universe held. You may not see
the result, but the result is there, and you know not what fruit may spring
from that tiny seed which you sow in passing along your path of peace and love.
How
Men Are Cured
Turning
from the general principles to the definite cures which are frequently
effected, it remains for us to consider how they are produced. There are
several methods, and I think we may divide them into four classes, though there
is also a fifth to which I must refer – one apart from any ordinary cures such
as we have to consider, but nevertheless necessary to make our list perfect.
1.
The first type is that which denies the existence of matter and disease, and
aims at curing the person simply by making him believe he is well. A
considerable amount of hypnotic influence is frequently exercised in the course
of such efforts, and the hope is that if the man really believes himself well,
the mind acting upon the body (which, however, does not exist) will force it
into harmony with itself, and so produce a cure. They never can call it a cure,
I notice, but always employ the scriptural word “healing,” so as to cast a sort
of religious glamour over the transaction, and suggest a comparison with the
miracles described in the bible. It seems to me better to divest the subject of
all unusual terms which tend to obscure the matter and throw a veil of
sentiment over plain fact. We say that the ordinary doctor “cures” us by his
skill; why then must we abandon the Latin word for the Saxon when we speak of
the result of a mind-cure?
2.
The second class holds (truly enough) that all illness means inharmony of some
sort in the system, and the effort of its members is to restore harmony,
usually by the transfer of vibrations from themselves. The operator endeavours
to bring himself into a condition of intense harmony and peace and devotion,
and then to project this influence upon the patient, or to enfold him in it.
The practitioner of either this type or the first does not care to know what is
the matter with the patient; the nature of the disease is of no importance to
him; in any case it must be disharmony, and he can cure it by establishing
harmony once more.
3.
The third class just pours vitality into the patient, again largely
irrespective of the nature of the disease, though some practitioners of this
method do make an attempt to direct their stream to the portion of the body
which is affected. Many people who are themselves in strong health radiate a
great deal of vitality quite unconsciously, and the sick or weak feel better
and stronger for their very presence.
4.
Our fourth class adopts what we may call, by comparison with the others, a
scientific method. They try to discover exactly what is wrong, picture to
themselves mentally the diseased organ, and then image it as it ought to be.
The idea here is that the strong thought will mould etheric matter into the
desired form, and that will help nature to build up new tissues much more
rapidly than would otherwise be possible. It is obvious that this plan demands
more knowledge than the others; to be successful along this line a person must
have at least some acquaintance with anatomy and some idea of physiology.
Types
of Disease
There
is no doubt that all these methods sometimes succeed, and they would do so
oftener and more fully if they were employed more scientifically and with
greater knowledge of the human body and its structure. Consider the various
classes of diseases to which we are subject. The mind-curists are right in
their contention that many of them proceed from want of harmony, and it is
chiefly want of harmony between the etheric and the physical particles in some
part of the body – most often of all in the brain. We must remember that there
is a close connection between the mental body, the astral body and the etheric
double in man, so that it is well within the bounds of possibility to influence
one of them through the others. All nervous diseases imply a jangled,
inharmonious condition of the etheric double; and that seems very often to be
the cause of diseases of the digestive organs, of headache and sleeplessness.
In all such cases what is needed is first of all to quiet the hurried,
irregular vibrations, and give Nature an opportunity to reassert herself. The
strong, quiet, persistent thought of the operator tends to produce such an
effect, and leaves the patient soothed and strengthened. The system of pouring
in vitality is also helpful, if it be not a type that will aggravate the
restless symptoms. In almost any kind of illness, to take the patient’s mind
off it, and calm and encourage him, is a long way towards a cure. Many a doctor
of the older schools does far more good by the confidence he inspires than by
his drugs.
But
there is a class of human ills where there is a definite lesion or wound. Can
mind-cure do anything with it? The first and second kind seem less effective
here, though always to quiet and encourage the sufferer increases his chance of
recovery. The third plan would also assist Nature to recuperate; but such cases
as these are certainly best met by the fourth method, according to which an
effort is made to image the wounded part as it should be in health, and thus
assist the building in of new tissue. This is of course merely an expedient to
hasten the natural process of recovery.
In
another class of human disease we have the presence of some poison in the
blood, and in yet another the illness is in reality the life-history of a
microbe, as is the case in most infectious diseases. It would probably be difficult
to deal directly with these by mental cure, but it might assist by giving the
patient greater strength to enable the natural guardians of his body to drive
out the foreign invader. I hear that the head of the least scientific of the
schools of mind-cure has recently issued an order that infectious cases should
not be treated by her followers. If people would only look at this matter
scientifically and reasonably, and consider exactly what mental treatment can
do, and what it cannot be expected to achieve, they would be saved much trouble
and danger. If they could understand that in many cases it is a valuable
auxiliary to the ordinary treatment, but is by no means always competent to
take its place, it might be more successful than it is now.
It
is obvious that different diseases must be met by different methods, and that
though there may perhaps be a universal cure for all physical ills, non of
these plans which I have described contain it. The strong centre of quiet
thought set up in the second of them cannot fail to do good to any man; yet
regarded as an attempt to cure a wound, let us say, it is a great waste of
force; it is like pouring a bucket of water over a man in order to wash his
finger! And being, as far as the wound is concerned, a blind effort, it can
never be so concentrated as one made on the fourth plan, which forms a mould to
assist Nature in repairing the damage. It is probable that a great Adept could
so hasten the natural process as to cause an almost instantaneous building into
shape of the tissues which had been injured or destroyed; but the thought of an
ordinary man is never strong enough for that, and he can only hope to produce
his result by continuous action.
A
Great Healing Principle
5.
Nevertheless, there is another method of which we know very little, though
unmistakable traces of it occasionally appear. No one who hears or reads of it
need presumptuously suppose that he or she possesses the power which it gives;
though unfortunately human self-conceit is so great that each is quite sure to
do so instantly! We who have to lecture or to write know this only too well. If
we, for the sake of our earnest students and as an encouragement for them, make
an effort to describe the sight of the buddhic plane, immediately somebody who
has perhaps once had half a glimpse of something astral will come trotting up
to say that his experiences on the buddhic plane were far grander than those
which the unfortunate lecturer or writer endeavoured to describe! But in spite
of this certainty that the information will be misapplied, I must yet mention
that there is another method connected with the great healing principle in
Nature – with a mighty life-force from some far higher level, which may under
certain circumstances and for a limited time be poured out through a man
without his detailed knowledge or volition. In that case his very touch will
heal, and there seems to be no limit to the power employed, and no disease that
cannot be cured by it. We know little of it, I say, except that it is among the
powers of one of the great orders of the devas, or angels, as our orthodox
friends would call them. The power undoubtedly exists, but beyond that we can
say very little. Our own president, Colonel Olcott, once possessed this
marvellous power for a time, and effected some extraordinary cures while it
remained with him.
Out
of it emerges this great fact, that through this idea of mind-cure many
thousands have been induced to accept the reality of the power of thought, and
to understand that there is something outside of this mere world of physical
matter; and that at least is a good thing, and an achievement upon which
mind-cure may reasonably be congratulated. But it will be well for those who
study it to learn that it should be used only for altruistic purposes, and to
try to raise their thought to something higher than the mere curing of the
physical body. For those who have no thought beyond that will presently find
their occupation gone, since as the world evolves there will surely come a time
when disease shall be no more, because man will at last have learnt to live
reasonably, purely and healthily. But if they turn their knowledge to a higher
use, and leave the physical for the mental, the curing of the body for the
development of the soul, they may be a mighty force for the evolution of the
world. Let them think less of body, and more of life and soul; less of removing
physical ailment, and more of removing ignorance and prejudice; less of bodily
health and of personal gain, and more of love and compassion and brotherhood;
so shall their rapidly-spreading movement become a power for good which cannot
readily be overestimated, a world-wide blessing which shall endure and flourish
through the ages which are yet to come.
Comments
Post a Comment